Turtleboy Daily News
News • Politics • Law & Crime
Access the community for free or support Turtleboy Daily News to interact and to get exclusive content.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Bryan Kohberger true crime
01:37:57

I did a monologue rant the other night called "If Karen Read did it" that I decided to turn into an article, and will be doing a video on. I've personally never really given much thought getting into the mind of Karen Read if she actually killed John O'Keefe, because it's an undeniable fact that she didn't. But the idea that she did it gets even crazier when you sit down and go through all the things she could've said and done afterwards to save herself, but for some reason chose not to:
https://tbdailynews.com/canton-coverup-part-444-if-karen-read-did-it/

post photo preview

State Police assigned to the Norfolk DA's Office charged John Jeffries, the chair of the Dover Select Board, with 3 counts of witness intimidation and 2 gun charges in early October. Because of his recklessness 2 guns are now in the hands of unknown car thieves. He attempted to use his power to intimidate the Chief (who he hired) and 2 cops from charging him, so State Police charged him with 3 counts of witness intimidation. The charges were dropped less than a month later and the DA's Office is only saying that Jeffries "reached an agreement" with the Town of Dover, and it's in the "interest of justice" not to pursue charges. Can I reach an unspecified agreement with the Town of Holden to have my charges dropped? After all, my "crimes" mostly occurred in this town while I was doing my show and writing articles. How is it in the "pursuit of justice" to drop charges against Jeffries, but not me or the rubber ducky kingpin? Apparently rubber duckies are more dangerous than guns. This is ...

post photo preview

For 2 years the Commonwealth stuck to the lie that Michael Proctor towed Karen Read's car at 5:30 because it would mean he couldn't plant tail light at 5:45. When they were caught with proof that the car was towed at 4:15 they called it a one time mistake and a "scrivener's error." Now for the first time we are seeing in a search warrant application for Read's phone that 5:30 was not a one time mistake. He wrote it 3 times, constituting a material misrepresentation to a judge in order to obtain a warrant:
https://tbdailynews.com/canton-coverup-part-443-michael-proctor-lied-3-times-about-seizing-karen-reads-phone-at-530-in-warrant-application/

post photo preview
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals